New Center for Housing Policy Study Finds Homeownership Remains Unaffordable for Many Key Workers – March 24, 2010

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Contacts:

Michele Anapol

(202) 466-2121, Ext. 226

manapol@nhc.org

Laura Woods

(202) 466-2121, Ext. 240

lwoods@nhc.org

HOMEOWNERSHIP REMAINS UNAFFORDABLE FOR MANY KEY WORKERS, DESPITE LOW INTEREST RATES AND STEEP DROPS IN HOME PRICES

New Study Takes In-Depth Look at Housing Challenges of “Green Economy” Workers and Others, Comparing and Ranking Costs in More Than 200 U.S. Metro Areas with the Wages of Over 60 Occupations

Washington, DC (March 23, 2010) – Purchasing a home remains unaffordable for many key community workers despite historically low mortgage interest rates and steep drops in home prices, according to a new study released today by the Center for Housing Policy entitled Paycheck to Paycheck: Wages and the Cost of Housing in America

.

Specifically, the study compares and ranks the costs of buying or renting a home in more than 200 U.S. metropolitan areas with salaries for over 60 occupations. Overall, the income needed to purchase a median-priced home dropped in 93 percent of the homeownership markets studied between 2008 and 2009, yet many workers still do not earn enough to own a home. In addition, the typical rent for a two-bedroom home rose in 89 percent of the markets studied. The steady rise in rents and the decline in mortgage costs nationwide may, to some extent, reflect a continued shift in demand from homeownership to rental housing as families exit homeownership due to foreclosure and as renters wait for market stability before buying a home. As the findings indicate, this trend was particularly noteworthy in Florida.

The study offers a unique glimpse at housing affordability for workers in the emerging “green economy” who help make the nation’s homes and businesses more energy efficient and help to produce clean and sustainable energy, including electrical engineering technicians, environmental engineering technicians, HVAC (heating, ventilating, and air conditioning) mechanics, maintenance and repair workers, and insulation workers. In addition, the study examines affordability for key “traditional” community workers, including police officers, elementary school teachers, licensed practical nurses, retail salespeople and janitors.

“While the green economy holds substantial promise as a source of higher-paying jobs, there are still many housing markets in which green economy workers cannot afford the costs of buying or renting a home,” said Center for Housing Policy Chair John K. McIlwain, senior resident fellow and the J. Ronald Terwilliger chair for housing at the Urban Land Institute. “We must develop the common sense, cost-effective policy solutions at the state and local levels that will help ensure long-term affordability for green economy workers and others. Otherwise, our workforce will face longer commutes and higher transportation costs, leading to increased traffic congestion and adverse environmental impacts.”

A Closer Look: U.S. Housing Affordability Trends

Green Economy Workers

According to the study, certain green economy workers were better able to afford housing than workers in other lower-paying jobs, confirming the general benefits of restructuring the economy to create more green jobs. For example, electrical engineering technicians were able to purchase a median-priced home in 122, and environmental engineering technicians and HVAC mechanics in 118, of the 208 homeownership markets studied.

Electrical engineering technicians were also able to rent a two-bedroom apartment in 198, environmental engineering technicians in 192, HVAC mechanics in 195, maintenance and repair workers in 146, and insulation workers in 142 of the 210 rental markets studied.

However, the study findings also revealed many markets where green economy workers were unable to afford the costs of buying or renting a typical home, suggesting that a greener economy, by itself, would not completely solve workers’ housing problems and reaffirming the need for well-designed housing policies to meet families’ needs.

The study found that maintenance and repair workers could not afford to purchase a median-priced home in 159, and insulation workers in 163, of the 208 markets studied. Among the comparatively higher paying green economy workers, electrical engineering technicians could not afford the purchase a median-priced home in 86, and environmental engineering technicians and HVAC mechanics in 90, of the 208 homeownership markets studied.

Traditional Community Workers

 

Homeownership Affordability: Many workers in the traditional economy fared worse than green economy workers. Even with lower interest rates and home prices, many workers are still unable to affordably buy a median-priced home in their communities. In addition to the continuing challenge of low salaries for many occupations, tighter credit markets and stricter lending practices make it more difficult for those who can now afford a home to actually qualify for one.

The homeownership affordability findings for traditional community workers reveal that police officers cannot afford to purchase the median-priced home in 86, elementary school teachers in 83, and licensed practical nurses in 146, of the 208 homeownership markets studied. Janitors cannot afford to purchase a home in 202, and retail salespeople in 207, of the markets studied.

Low interest rates and falling home prices have made homeownership newly affordable for police officers in 37, elementary school teachers in 33, and licensed practical nurses in 26, previously unaffordable metro areas.

The markets with highest median home prices are: San Francisco, CA; San Jose, CA; Honolulu, HI; Santa Ana, CA; and Santa Cruz, CA. And places with the steepest drops in income needed to purchase a median-priced home include: Atlantic, NJ, and Ocala, Fort Lauderdale, Port St. Lucie, and Cape Coral, FL.

Rental Affordability: The study found that in the vast majority of metropolitan markets, fair market rents have held steady or increased – occasionally surpassing monthly mortgage payments for a median-priced home. Specifically, retail salespeople continue to be priced out of renting a two-bedroom apartment in every market studied. Janitors fare almost the same, being able to afford a two-bedroom apartment in only one of the 210 rental markets studied. Licensed practical nurses are unable to rent a two-bedroom apartment in 55, police officers in 12, and elementary school teachers in 11, of the markets studied.

Rents have increased in 89 percent of the markets studied, with only 23 metro areas experiencing a rent decrease. Places with the highest increases in rents over the one-year period studied include: Knoxville, TN; Tucson, AZ; Charleston, SC; Bakersfield, CA; and Sarasota, FL.

U.S. Metropolitan Area Rankings

Fact Sheet – Most to Least Expensive Homeownership Markets

Fact Sheet – Most to Least Expensive Rental Markets

Fact Sheet – Changes in the Qualifying Income Needed to Purchase a Home

A Message from CHAPA’s Executive Director Regarding the Defeat of Question 2 – November 4, 2010

Dear CHAPA Members:

On behalf of the board and staff, I want to offer my sincere thanks to everyone who worked on the Campaign to Protect the Affordable Housing Law. With your help, we were able to achieve a decisive victory of 58% to 42%, which was the largest margin of any ballot campaign. Over 1.2 million voters and 80% of cities and towns affirmed their support for protecting the affordable housing law for seniors and working families in urban, suburban, and rural communities all across the state. If you’d like to see how your town voted, click here.

We are very proud of the unprecedented grassroots coalition of diverse groups and individuals that rallied together with the affordable housing community. This included representatives from civic, business, labor, religious, municipal, academic, human services, environmental, residents living in affordable housing, civil rights, and many others.

We not only protected the primary tool to create affordable housing in Massachusetts, but we also helped to increase public awareness about who affordable housing helps, what it looks like, and how it contributes to our overall economy.

I look forward to working with everyone to help build on this momentum to achieve new policy gains in affordable housing and community development in the near future.

Thanks once again for all of your support and commitment.

Aaron Gornstein
Executive Director

Rentals Harder to Find, Afford (Boston Globe) – August 10, 2010

The region’s rental market has tightened in recent months, with apartment vacancies falling and rents rising for the first time since the beginning of the economic crisis.

Analysts said the changes, while small, signal a market shift that is making apartments harder to find and afford when many families are struggling with lost jobs, lost homes, and pay cuts.

Click here to read the full article.

Patrick-Murray Administration Targets $153.9 million Statewide to Build, Preserve Affordable Rental Housing – January 11, 2010

As part of the Patrick-Murray Administration’s Massachusetts Recovery Plan to secure the state’s economic future, Governor Deval Patrick and Lieutenant Governor Timothy Murray were in New Bedford today to announce that the state will invest $153.9 million in resources leveraged from various affordable housing programs, American Recovery and Reinvestment Act funds, and private investment to support 26 projects in 17 communities across the state. When completed, those projects will create or preserve 1,305 rental homes, 1,147 of which will be affordable to low-and moderate-income working families and individuals, including 144 units set aside for families transitioning to permanent housing from homelessness.

Please click here for the full press release.

Federal Housing Finance Agency Proposes New Housing Goals for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac – February 18, 2010

Washington, DC — The Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) has sent a proposed rule to the Federal Register establishing new housing goals for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac (the Enterprises). The Housing and Economic Recovery Act of 2008 (HERA) gave FHFA authority for establishing housing goals for the Enterprises. Previously the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) set the Enterprises’ housing goals.

For 2010 and 2011, FHFA is proposing levels for three single-family home purchase goals: low-income families, very low-income families, and families in low-income/high minority/disaster areas. The proposed rule also contains goals for single-family refinance mortgages for low-income families. These are the goal categories established in HERA. The home purchase and refinance goals are all expressed as minimum goal-qualifying shares of each type of mortgage purchased by the Enterprises.

Please click here for the full press release.

National Low Income Housing Coalition Releases Annual Out of Reach Study – April 22, 2010

Despite the emphasis on homeownership and the marginalization of renters, renter households still make up fully one-third of the households in the United States — almost 38 million households. Out of Reach is a side-by-side comparison of wages and rents in every county, Metropolitan Area (MSAs/HMFAs), combined nonmetropolitan area and state in the United States.

Please click here to view the study’s findings.